Wetenschap

Semenanalyse

Advies van de Werkgroep Semen NVKC/KLEM

Semendiagnostiek wordt in een groot aantal Nederlandse laboratoria uitgevoerd. Bij deze uitvoering wordt routinematig gebruik gemaakt van een gestandaardiseerde methode welke beschreven is in de door de World Health Organization (WHO) uitgebrachte Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (WHO-handboek).

Referenties

  1. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  2. Richtlijn Semenanalyse. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie en Laboratoriumgeneeskunde en de Vereniging van Klinisch Embryologen. 2010-2015.
  3. Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C et al. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2016 Jun;105(6):1462-8.
  4. Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C et al. Optimization of laboratory procedures for intrauterine insemination: survey of methods in relation to clinical outcome. 2018 Jun 29.
  5. Van den Hoven L, Hendriks JC, Verbeet JG et al. Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan;103(1):53-8.
  6. Hunault CC, Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ et al. Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2019-26.
  7. Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ et al. Pregnancy is predictable: a large-scale prospective external validation of the prediction of spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2007 Feb;22(2):536-42.
  8. Mannelijke subfertiliteit, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie, Versie 1.0, 2010.
  9. Drobnis EZ en Nangia AK. Impacts of Medications on Male Fertility. ISBN 978-3-319-69534-1.
  10. Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Andersson AM et al. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:358-366.
  11. De Jonge C, LaFromboise M, Bosmans E et al. Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertil Steril 2004;85: 57-65.
  12. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weiss N et al. Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence duration and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:1680-1686.
  13. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weisz N et al. Relationship between sexual abstinence duratin and the acrosome index in teratozoospermic semen: analysis of 1800 semen samples. Andrologia 2006;38:110-112.
  14. Bahadur G, Almossawi O, Zeirideen Zaid R et al. Semen characteristics in consecutive ejaculates with short abstinence in subfertile males. Reprod Biomed Online 2016b; 32:323–328
  15. Ayad BM, Horst GV, Plessis SSD. Revisiting the relationship between the ejaculatory abstinence period and semen characteristics. Int J of Fertil and Steril. Vol 11, No 4, Jan-Mar 2018, pages: 238-246.
  16. Richtlijn Gebruik van reagentia, materialen en apparatuur tijdens geassisteerde voortplanting. Vereniging van Klinisch Embryologen (KLEM). Juni 2014.
  17. Jung A, Schuppe HC. Influence of genital heat stress on semen quality in humans. Andrologia 2007; 39:203-2015.
  18. Mínguez-Alarcón L, Gaskins AJ, Chiu YH et al. Type of underwear worn and markers of testicular function among men attending a fertility center. Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1749-1756.
  19. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory handbook for the examination of human semen and semencervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  20. The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia. Clinics. 2013;68(S1):35-38.
  21. Barratt CL, Björndahl L, Menkveld R et al. ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance. Human Reproduction, Volume 26, Issue 12, December 2011, 3207–3212.
  22. Björndahl L. The usefulness and significance of assessing rapidly progressive spermatozoa. Asian Journal of Andrology (2010) 12: 33–35.
  23. Kruger TF, du Toit TC, Franken DR et al. Sperm morphology: assessing the agreement between the manual method (strict criteria) and the sperm morphology analyzer IVOS. Fertil Steril. 1995 Jan;63(1):134-41.
  24. Liu DY, Garrett C, Baker HW et al. Low proportions of sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003 Nov;18(11):2382-9.
  25. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1388-93.
  26. Gatimel N, Moreau J, Parinaud J et al. Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017. Andrology. 2017 Sep;5(5):845-862.
  27. Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R et al. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1369-82.
  28. Auger J. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian Journal of Andrology (2010) 12: 36-46.
  29. Koscinski I, Elinati E, Fossard C et al. DPY19L2 deletion as a major cause of globozoospermia. Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Mar 11;88(3):344-50.
  30. Bensdorp AJ, van der Steeg JW, Steures P et al. A revised prediction model for natural conception. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jun;34(6):619-626.
  31. Mortimer ST, van der Horst G, Mortimer D et al. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(4):545-53.
  32. Valverde A, Areán H, Fernández A et al. Combined effect of type and capture area of counting chamber and diluent on Holstein bull sperm kinematics. Andrologia. 2019 May;51(4).
  33. Lammers J, Splingart C, Barrière P. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet (2014) 31:35–43.
  34. Engel KM, Grunewald S, Schiller J et al. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision® versus the manual approach-A prospective double-blind study. Andrologia. 2019 Feb;51(1).
  35. Busacca M, Fusi F, Brigante C et al. Evaluation of antisperm antibodies in infertile couples with immunobead test: prevalence and prognostic value. Acta Eur Fertil 1989;20:77‐82.
  36. Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P et al. Immunoglobulin G antisperm antibodies and prediction of spontaneous pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1659‐65.
  37. Landelijke netwerkrichtlijn Subfertiliteit. Ontwikkeld in het kader van het ZonMw programma Kennisbeleid, Kwaliteit Curatieve Zorg (KKCZ) (No. 150020015) i.s.m. NHG, NVOG, NVU, NVKC, NVAB), KLEM, LVMP), PAZ, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud en Patiëntenvereniging voor vruchtbaarheidsproblematiek ‘Freya’.
  38. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory handbook for the examination of human semen and semencervical mucus interaction. 1th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
  39. Tomlinson MJ, Pooley K, Simpson T et al. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms. Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1911-20.
  40. Boer AK. Ontwikkeling en validatie van een systematisch intern kwaliteitsbewakingprogramma voor microscopische semenbeoordeling met behulp verse semenstalen. Ned Tijdschr Klin Chem Labgeneesk 2011; 36: 233-236.
Wetenschap

Semenanalyse

Advies van de Werkgroep Semen NVKC/KLEM

Semendiagnostiek wordt in een groot aantal Nederlandse laboratoria uitgevoerd. Bij deze uitvoering wordt routinematig gebruik gemaakt van een gestandaardiseerde methode welke beschreven is in de door de World Health Organization (WHO) uitgebrachte Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (WHO-handboek).

Referenties

  1. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  2. Richtlijn Semenanalyse. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie en Laboratoriumgeneeskunde en de Vereniging van Klinisch Embryologen. 2010-2015.
  3. Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C et al. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2016 Jun;105(6):1462-8.
  4. Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C et al. Optimization of laboratory procedures for intrauterine insemination: survey of methods in relation to clinical outcome. 2018 Jun 29.
  5. Van den Hoven L, Hendriks JC, Verbeet JG et al. Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan;103(1):53-8.
  6. Hunault CC, Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ et al. Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2019-26.
  7. Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ et al. Pregnancy is predictable: a large-scale prospective external validation of the prediction of spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2007 Feb;22(2):536-42.
  8. Mannelijke subfertiliteit, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie, Versie 1.0, 2010.
  9. Drobnis EZ en Nangia AK. Impacts of Medications on Male Fertility. ISBN 978-3-319-69534-1.
  10. Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Andersson AM et al. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:358-366.
  11. De Jonge C, LaFromboise M, Bosmans E et al. Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertil Steril 2004;85: 57-65.
  12. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weiss N et al. Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence duration and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:1680-1686.
  13. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weisz N et al. Relationship between sexual abstinence duratin and the acrosome index in teratozoospermic semen: analysis of 1800 semen samples. Andrologia 2006;38:110-112.
  14. Bahadur G, Almossawi O, Zeirideen Zaid R et al. Semen characteristics in consecutive ejaculates with short abstinence in subfertile males. Reprod Biomed Online 2016b; 32:323–328
  15. Ayad BM, Horst GV, Plessis SSD. Revisiting the relationship between the ejaculatory abstinence period and semen characteristics. Int J of Fertil and Steril. Vol 11, No 4, Jan-Mar 2018, pages: 238-246.
  16. Richtlijn Gebruik van reagentia, materialen en apparatuur tijdens geassisteerde voortplanting. Vereniging van Klinisch Embryologen (KLEM). Juni 2014.
  17. Jung A, Schuppe HC. Influence of genital heat stress on semen quality in humans. Andrologia 2007; 39:203-2015.
  18. Mínguez-Alarcón L, Gaskins AJ, Chiu YH et al. Type of underwear worn and markers of testicular function among men attending a fertility center. Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1749-1756.
  19. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory handbook for the examination of human semen and semencervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  20. The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia. Clinics. 2013;68(S1):35-38.
  21. Barratt CL, Björndahl L, Menkveld R et al. ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance. Human Reproduction, Volume 26, Issue 12, December 2011, 3207–3212.
  22. Björndahl L. The usefulness and significance of assessing rapidly progressive spermatozoa. Asian Journal of Andrology (2010) 12: 33–35.
  23. Kruger TF, du Toit TC, Franken DR et al. Sperm morphology: assessing the agreement between the manual method (strict criteria) and the sperm morphology analyzer IVOS. Fertil Steril. 1995 Jan;63(1):134-41.
  24. Liu DY, Garrett C, Baker HW et al. Low proportions of sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003 Nov;18(11):2382-9.
  25. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1388-93.
  26. Gatimel N, Moreau J, Parinaud J et al. Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017. Andrology. 2017 Sep;5(5):845-862.
  27. Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R et al. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1369-82.
  28. Auger J. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian Journal of Andrology (2010) 12: 36-46.
  29. Koscinski I, Elinati E, Fossard C et al. DPY19L2 deletion as a major cause of globozoospermia. Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Mar 11;88(3):344-50.
  30. Bensdorp AJ, van der Steeg JW, Steures P et al. A revised prediction model for natural conception. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jun;34(6):619-626.
  31. Mortimer ST, van der Horst G, Mortimer D et al. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(4):545-53.
  32. Valverde A, Areán H, Fernández A et al. Combined effect of type and capture area of counting chamber and diluent on Holstein bull sperm kinematics. Andrologia. 2019 May;51(4).
  33. Lammers J, Splingart C, Barrière P. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet (2014) 31:35–43.
  34. Engel KM, Grunewald S, Schiller J et al. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision® versus the manual approach-A prospective double-blind study. Andrologia. 2019 Feb;51(1).
  35. Busacca M, Fusi F, Brigante C et al. Evaluation of antisperm antibodies in infertile couples with immunobead test: prevalence and prognostic value. Acta Eur Fertil 1989;20:77‐82.
  36. Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P et al. Immunoglobulin G antisperm antibodies and prediction of spontaneous pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1659‐65.
  37. Landelijke netwerkrichtlijn Subfertiliteit. Ontwikkeld in het kader van het ZonMw programma Kennisbeleid, Kwaliteit Curatieve Zorg (KKCZ) (No. 150020015) i.s.m. NHG, NVOG, NVU, NVKC, NVAB), KLEM, LVMP), PAZ, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud en Patiëntenvereniging voor vruchtbaarheidsproblematiek ‘Freya’.
  38. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory handbook for the examination of human semen and semencervical mucus interaction. 1th ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
  39. Tomlinson MJ, Pooley K, Simpson T et al. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms. Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1911-20.
  40. Boer AK. Ontwikkeling en validatie van een systematisch intern kwaliteitsbewakingprogramma voor microscopische semenbeoordeling met behulp verse semenstalen. Ned Tijdschr Klin Chem Labgeneesk 2011; 36: 233-236.
Over dit artikel
Auteurs
Jacoline Brinkman, Snjezana Kos, Leonie van den Hoven, Netty van Vrouwerff, Eus Arts, Albert Wolthuis, Alex Wetzels, Cornelis Beijer
Over de auteurs

Dr. Jacoline W. Brinkman, Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie en Hematologie, Ziekenhuis St. Jansdal, Harderwijk.
Dr. Snjezana Kos, Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie en Hematologie, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam.
Ing. Leonie van den Hoven, Fertiliteitslaboratorium, Radboudumc, Nijmegen.
Ing. Netty van Vrouwerff, Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie en Hematologie, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein.
Dr. Eus Arts, Laboratorium voor Voortplantingsgeneeskunde, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen.
Dr. Albert Wolthuis, Certe Medische Diagnostiek & Advies, Leeuwarden.
Dr. Alex Wetzels, Fertiliteitslaboratorium, Radboudumc, Nijmegen.
Drs. Cornelis Beijer, gepensioneerd.

Namens de Werkgroep Semen van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie en Laboratoriumgeneeskunde (NVKC) en de Vereniging voor Klinische Embryologie (KLEM).

Printdatum
14 juli 2020
E-pubdatum
17 juli 2020
ISSN print
2589-4153
ISSN online
2589-6296
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24078/labgeneeskunde.2020.7.125633


Over dit artikel
Auteurs
Jacoline Brinkman, Snjezana Kos, Leonie van den Hoven, Netty van Vrouwerff, Eus Arts, Albert Wolthuis, Alex Wetzels, Cornelis Beijer
Over de auteurs

Dr. Jacoline W. Brinkman, Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie en Hematologie, Ziekenhuis St. Jansdal, Harderwijk.
Dr. Snjezana Kos, Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie en Hematologie, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam.
Ing. Leonie van den Hoven, Fertiliteitslaboratorium, Radboudumc, Nijmegen.
Ing. Netty van Vrouwerff, Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie en Hematologie, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein.
Dr. Eus Arts, Laboratorium voor Voortplantingsgeneeskunde, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen.
Dr. Albert Wolthuis, Certe Medische Diagnostiek & Advies, Leeuwarden.
Dr. Alex Wetzels, Fertiliteitslaboratorium, Radboudumc, Nijmegen.
Drs. Cornelis Beijer, gepensioneerd.

Namens de Werkgroep Semen van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie en Laboratoriumgeneeskunde (NVKC) en de Vereniging voor Klinische Embryologie (KLEM).

Printdatum
14 juli 2020
E-pubdatum
17 juli 2020
ISSN print
2589-4153
ISSN online
2589-6296
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24078/labgeneeskunde.2020.7.125633